Blog / RBC Capital Markets Interview Questions
Firm-Specific Prep
RBC Capital Markets Interview Questions
These are real technical questions asked in recent RBC Capital Markets interviews, sourced directly from candidates who went through the process — not a generic guide. Below: what to expect, worked answers to the most representative questions, and common mistakes that trip candidates up.
What RBC Capital Markets's interview process actually looks like
RBC's generalist technical rounds pair standard WACC and capital structure mechanics with genuine stock-pitch rigor — be ready to defend a short thesis beyond "the stock is overvalued," with a specific catalyst, not just a high multiple.
Real questions asked in recent RBC Capital Markets interviews
Question: If a large, investment-grade public company with a low cost of capital is acquiring a smaller, riskier target, whose discount rate should you use when building a DCF to value the target for the acquisition?
How to answer it: The discount rate should generally reflect the risk of the cash flows being discounted, not who happens to be buying them, so in principle you'd use the target's own standalone cost of capital, since that's what compensates for the actual risk of the target's business regardless of who owns it. In practice, though, once the target is acquired its cash flows may become less risky from the market's perspective, since they're now backed by the acquirer's balance sheet, stronger credit profile, and potentially lower cost of debt, so some practitioners argue for using something closer to the acquirer's cost of capital, or a blend, particularly if the target will be fully integrated and its standalone credit profile effectively disappears post-close. The more defensible convention, and what most interviewers are actually listening for, is that you value the target on a standalone basis using its own discount rate to determine what it's intrinsically worth, and handle any value created by lower-cost acquirer financing separately as part of the synergy or financing analysis, rather than baking a lower discount rate directly into the target's standalone valuation, since conflating the two overstates the price a rational buyer should pay for the business itself.
Common mistake: Automatically using the acquirer's lower cost of capital to discount the target's cash flows, which overstates the target's standalone intrinsic value
Question: Pitch me a long and a short. What has to be true about your short thesis for it to hold up, beyond just 'the stock is overvalued'?
How to answer it: A credible short thesis needs more than a high valuation multiple, since expensive stocks can stay expensive for a long time, so the pitch needs a specific catalyst or deteriorating fundamental, slowing growth, margin compression, a competitive threat, an accounting or disclosure red flag, that the market hasn't yet priced in and that will force a re-rating within a reasonable timeframe. It also needs to grapple honestly with the risk side of a short specifically: unlike a long position where losses are capped at 100% of the investment, a short position has theoretically unlimited downside if the thesis is wrong and the stock keeps rising, so a complete short pitch addresses position sizing, a defined stop-loss level, or a hedge, not just the fundamental argument for why the company is overvalued. Contrasting the long and short side by side is also useful: if both picks share the same macro or sector exposure, the pairing demonstrates you're isolating a specific view on one company relative to a peer rather than just making a directional bet on the whole sector, which is generally what interviewers are listening for in a paired long/short pitch.
Common mistake: Basing a short thesis purely on valuation being high, without identifying a specific catalyst that would force the market to re-rate the stock
Also reported from recent interviews at this firm:
- When calculating WACC, should you use the company's marginal tax rate or its effective tax rate, and why does it matter?
- If higher beta is associated with a higher discount rate and therefore a lower valuation in a DCF, why would a high-beta company like Tesla still be valued so highly by the market?
Full explanations and common mistakes for these — plus the rest of our Firm Specific bank — are in the app.
How to prepare specifically for RBC Capital Markets
Generic IB prep guides cover the fundamentals every bank tests, but firm-specific patterns like the ones above only show up when you're practicing against real, recently-reported questions rather than a static 400-question PDF everyone else is also using. ApexIB's Firm Specific question bank is built directly from questions candidates report after their actual interviews — including RBC Capital Markets — with AI grading and full explanations, not just a list.
Frequently asked questions
What makes RBC's stock pitch questions different from standard technicals?
RBC interviewers specifically push on whether a short thesis has a concrete catalyst, not just a valuation observation — "it's expensive" alone won't hold up to the follow-up.
Where do these questions come from?
Directly from candidates who interviewed at RBC Capital Markets and reported their questions afterward, not from a generic template applied to every firm.
Related articles