Blog / Goldman Sachs Interview Questions
Firm-Specific Prep
Goldman Sachs Interview Questions
These are real technical questions asked in recent Goldman Sachs interviews, sourced directly from candidates who went through the process — not a generic guide. Below: what to expect, worked answers to the most representative questions, and common mistakes that trip candidates up.
What Goldman Sachs's interview process actually looks like
Goldman's technical bar is high and generalist — full DCF builds with an eye for the specific places candidates gloss over, accretion/dilution edge cases, and precedent-versus-trading-comps reasoning that goes past the memorized one-liner.
Real questions asked in recent Goldman Sachs interviews
Question: Walk me through a full DCF build from unlevered free cash flow to implied share price, and flag the places most candidates gloss over.
How to answer it: Start from EBIT, tax-affect it to get NOPAT, then add back D&A, subtract capex and the change in net working capital to arrive at unlevered free cash flow for each projection year; discount each year's UFCF back to present value using WACC, then calculate terminal value either via the perpetuity growth method or an exit multiple applied to the final year's EBITDA, and discount that back as well. Sum the present values of the explicit period cash flows and the terminal value to get enterprise value, then bridge to equity value by subtracting net debt, minority interest, and preferred equity, and divide by diluted shares outstanding to get implied share price. The places candidates most often gloss over are the terminal value discount period, which should use the same discount factor as the final explicit year rather than one period further, the treatment of the mid-year convention if used, and reconciling why the perpetuity growth and exit multiple methods might imply meaningfully different terminal values, since a large gap between the two usually signals an inconsistent assumption somewhere.
Common mistake: Discounting the terminal value one period too far by using the number of years plus one instead of matching the final explicit forecast year's discount period
Question: In an all-stock merger, why does an acquirer with a higher P/E multiple than the target usually see the deal come out accretive, and what's the one situation where that rule of thumb breaks down?
How to answer it: The intuitive shortcut is that if the acquirer trades at a higher P/E than the target, it's buying earnings cheap relative to how the market values its own earnings, so combined pro forma EPS tends to rise, making the deal accretive; if the reverse is true, it's typically dilutive. The rule of thumb breaks down when there's a large disparity in the premium paid, since even a favorable P/E gap can be overwhelmed by issuing enough new shares to cover a rich premium. It also breaks down when there are significant synergies or dis-synergies, since those move pro forma net income independent of the base P/E comparison, so a low-premium, low-synergy all-stock deal is where the simple rule of thumb holds most cleanly.
Common mistake: Applying the P/E comparison rule of thumb mechanically without checking whether the premium paid is large enough to overwhelm it
Also reported from recent interviews at this firm:
- Why does a precedent transactions analysis typically imply a higher valuation than a trading comps analysis?
- If you lever up a company's capital structure by adding more debt, what happens to its levered beta and why, holding underlying business risk constant?
Full explanations and common mistakes for these — plus the rest of our Firm Specific bank — are in the app.
How to prepare specifically for Goldman Sachs
Generic IB prep guides cover the fundamentals every bank tests, but firm-specific patterns like the ones above only show up when you're practicing against real, recently-reported questions rather than a static 400-question PDF everyone else is also using. ApexIB's Firm Specific question bank is built directly from questions candidates report after their actual interviews — including Goldman Sachs — with AI grading and full explanations, not just a list.
Frequently asked questions
How technical are Goldman Sachs interviews compared to other bulge brackets?
Comparably technical, but interviewers tend to push one level past the standard answer — expect a follow-up asking you to flag where most candidates make mistakes, not just the baseline mechanic.
Where do these questions come from?
Directly from candidates who interviewed at Goldman Sachs and reported their questions afterward, not from a generic template applied to every firm.
Related articles